Home Sweet Home: Preservation and Appreciation for Unique and Historic Residential Architecture in Los Angeles
by Sophia Scorziello
We like to talk about the importance of a home. There’s no place like it, we say. It’s where the heart is, we also say. These structures, both literal and figurative entities, are important places that exist in communities. Not only do the walls of homes provide shelter and cover the basic needs of human beings, but they also decorate streets, neighborhoods and cities, and stand as representations of the people they house. From an aesthetic and social viewpoint, residential architecture is crucial to telling the history of a place and its people. And in a city like Los Angeles, it can be the only marker of some place or time that has since passed.
In tandem with westward expansion across America, the architecture of Los Angeles is fairly new compared to that on the East Coast. The oldest standing home in New York City was first built in 1652, and the oldest in Boston was built in 1661. In Los Angeles, however, the oldest home still standing was built over a century later, in 1818. This means that most of the homes built after that are also still standing, some less than 100 years old. These homes are living pieces of history, pieces of history we drive by, walk by, and live in every day.
So what happens if they disappear? Organizations like Friends of Residential Architecture Los Angeles and the LA Conservancy are fighting to show the dangers of eradicating important pieces of Los Angeles architecture. In 2020, the LA Conservancy released a new study titled “Preservation Positive Los Angeles.” The study reviewed LA’s Historic Preservation Overlay Zones, known as HPOZs, to show how preservation can promote stability, diversity, affordability, sustainability, and other important factors that affect Angelinos. HPOZs are sanctioned areas of the city that require new projects to mirror the historical aesthetic of its surroundings. Adopted HPOZs in LA include the Hollywood Grove, Van Nuys, Lincoln Heights, along with many other neighborhoods.
The study reports that the older homes of LA are “shining examples of naturally occurring or unsubsidized affordable housing.” The monthly rent of studio apartments in LA constructed prior to 1920 up until 1959, on average, cost $1,000 less than those built after 2000. As older apartment buildings are replaced with new, fresher models, affordable rent dissipates. In terms of home ownership, the square footage of HPOZ single-home properties, on average, is valued to be worth around $30 more than a square foot of property in the rest of Los Angeles.
HPOZs are also a marker of diversity. Twenty one of the 35 preservation zones are more racially diverse than Los Angeles is a whole. The study says that these spaces are not just home to people of various races, but also a variety of incomes.
And moreover, HPOZs are said to be home to more job growth than non-HPOZs. The Conservancy reported that from 2005 to 2015, HPOZs saw a 26 percent increase in jobs, compared to the rest of LA’s 15 percent increase.
But even homes outside of HPOZs have distinct characteristics that make them excellent examples of ornate and unique architecture that should be valued just as much as a home in a historic zone. The argument for architectural appreciation has been explored by many, including Alain De Botton in his book “The Architecture of Happiness.”
“Taking architecture seriously therefore makes some singular and strenuous demands upon us. It requires that we open ourselves to the idea that we are affected by our surroundings even when they are made of vinyl and would be expensive and time-consuming to ameliorate…“More awkwardly still, architecture asks us to imagine that happiness might often have an unostentatious, unheroic character to it, that it might be found in a run of old floorboards or in a wash of morning light over a plaster wall – in undramatic, frangible scenes of beauty that move us because we are aware of the darker backdrop against which they are set.”
–Alain De Botton, The Architecture of Happiness
What’s most interesting about the points Botton makes in his book is that the beauty of a home is subjective. The structures that we deem beautiful are not deemed so because they check off a number of requirements. Just like any piece of art, the beauty of a home is in the eye of the beholder. But the fact that a home is an occupiable piece of art makes it a lot different than other art forms. Homes are often the foundation upon which people build their lives. Not seeing beauty in your home, or in the homes that surround you, is a little bit like hating what you see when you look in the mirror. As far-fetched as this might seem, homes represent the people that occupy them. When you invite someone into your home, the assumptions and opinions they make based on what they see are a reflection of you. So a home with character, obvious attention to detail, anything that makes you actually feel something when looking at it, is something that should be valued
My curiosity surrounding residential architecture began with the house I’ve been living in for two years now. It’s a remodeled Westchester tract home full of stained glass, biophilic rock structures and more mirrors than there are people living here (which is six). The above photos are just a couple of examples of the intricate stained glass in my Westchester, Los Angeles home. Originally a tract home from the 1950s, Allen Nugier renovated much of the property using extensive engineering skills acquired at Cal Poly University. Today, the home is rented out to Loyola Marymount students and has even housed an LMU professor and his family in recent years.
When I leave my house in the morning and see neighbors walking by, I imagine them admiring the orange and red shimmer of our windows, and when friends come to our house for the first time, I show my home off like a museum. Valuing the uniqueness of my home makes me feel good, and my home has become an intrinsic part of my identity.
I decided to explore Los Angeles in search of homes that made me feel the way mine does. With the help of trail guides from FORT LA and reviews made by Los Angeles City Planning, I toured 7 different areas of the city photographing homes that represented a time period, a lifestyle or any inkling of architecture for architecture’s sake.